<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictably Irrational</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adventuresinoss.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adventuresinoss.com/?p=439</link>
	<description>The Mouth of OpenNMS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarus</title>
		<link>http://www.adventuresinoss.com/?p=439&#038;cpage=1#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>tarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.opennms.org/?p=439#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>Actually, it doesn&#039;t need to be apples-to-apples. When presented with the three choices, 84% chose the combined option, 0% chose the print only option, and 16% chose the web option. When the print-only option was removed, 32% chose the combined option and 68% chose the web option - a huge change.

It wasn&#039;t a justification of which option was better for an individual, but a demonstration of the power a decoy has to make people choose differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it doesn&#8217;t need to be apples-to-apples. When presented with the three choices, 84% chose the combined option, 0% chose the print only option, and 16% chose the web option. When the print-only option was removed, 32% chose the combined option and 68% chose the web option &#8211; a huge change.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a justification of which option was better for an individual, but a demonstration of the power a decoy has to make people choose differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovelace</title>
		<link>http://www.adventuresinoss.com/?p=439&#038;cpage=1#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>lovelace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.opennms.org/?p=439#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>My main problem with the magazine example is that the comparison is not apples-to-apples.  When I look at a magazine that has both online &amp; print versions, I will always choose the print version because it&#039;s much easier for me to read a print version (you don&#039;t have to have a computer with you, you can take it anywhere, the contrast on the eyes is much better).  For that reason alone I would choose print over an electronic version (and, in fact, do for at least a couple of subscriptions I have).  And, then, obviously, if the print and print+electronic versions are the same price, I will choose the latter since every now and then being able to access an electronic version is useful.  But, price alone would not be the primary motivator there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main problem with the magazine example is that the comparison is not apples-to-apples.  When I look at a magazine that has both online &amp; print versions, I will always choose the print version because it&#8217;s much easier for me to read a print version (you don&#8217;t have to have a computer with you, you can take it anywhere, the contrast on the eyes is much better).  For that reason alone I would choose print over an electronic version (and, in fact, do for at least a couple of subscriptions I have).  And, then, obviously, if the print and print+electronic versions are the same price, I will choose the latter since every now and then being able to access an electronic version is useful.  But, price alone would not be the primary motivator there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
